Search 
 


Solutions Overview
  RCM
  RCM Archiving vs Traditional Archiving
  Business Issues
Hosted Solution
Records Management
E-mail & IM Management
Legal Discovery
SAP Archiving
COLD Archiving
Electronic Document Delivery
Financial Management
   
 

Records Compliance Management (RCM) Archiving vs. Traditional Archiving

Introduction | Side-by-Side Comparison
Features RCM Traditional Archiving Description
Record Management No Records are captured, secured, supervised, managed and destroyed in accordance with established policies and procedures
Audit Trails No Failure to provide audit trail threatens the integrity and privacy of archived records
Record Encryption No Records stored in plain text databases allow theft and unauthorized removal of data
Restricted Access No Failure to restrict access is a breach of data privacy rights
Show complete record No A simple record listing indicates deletions and alterations are allowed
Multiple system support No Single system support means organizations are tied to a particular system and can't switch without disturbing archive integrity
Record Compression No Saves Storage
Real-time replication, no tape backup required No Tape back-ups are slow… probability of data loss is high
Tamperproof storage No Storage that can be tampered limits the evidential value of the records it contains
Digital signature on all records No No digital signature means records can be modified without detection


Solutions  
Get Started

Subscribe to our newsletter
Request a call
MONY testimonial
New York Life testimonial
Why a Records Compliance Platform is important
 
Literature

AXS-One Compliance Platform
Whitepaper (Bloor Research Evaluation)
Compliance case study

Home